<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tour de France or Tour du dopage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcelhearn.com/2007/07/26/tour-de-france-or-tour-du-dopage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2007/07/26/tour-de-france-or-tour-du-dopage/</link>
	<description>Writings about more than just Macs, by Kirk McElhearn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spride</title>
		<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2007/07/26/tour-de-france-or-tour-du-dopage/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>spride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcelhearn.com/wordpress/?p=276#comment-613</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m neither surprised nor shocked. Riding the modern Tour, let alone winning 
it, is impossible without chemical help. The ASO is committed to the Tour-
as-Spectacle, so there is profound resistance to altering the course to make 
it feasible without drugs. For every sop such as the extra rest day in 07 
there&#039;s a murderous kink like the team time trial up Mont Ventoux of last 
year. All the other classics are more or less the same. The level of 
superhuman excellence needed to be a pro rider and make  a living at it 
dictates that the riders will need superhuman assistance. Whilst the race 
organizers persist in setting courses that only the doped can conquer, 
doping will be inevitable and universal.e the few deaths each season from 
EPO or bad vitamins and carry on. 

Cynically, I don&#039;t think doping matters much in terms of sportsmanship, for 
the simple reason that everybody&#039;s already doping. It&#039;s a level playing field, 
albeit a toxic one. 



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m neither surprised nor shocked. Riding the modern Tour, let alone winning<br />
it, is impossible without chemical help. The ASO is committed to the Tour-<br />
as-Spectacle, so there is profound resistance to altering the course to make<br />
it feasible without drugs. For every sop such as the extra rest day in 07<br />
there&#8217;s a murderous kink like the team time trial up Mont Ventoux of last<br />
year. All the other classics are more or less the same. The level of<br />
superhuman excellence needed to be a pro rider and make  a living at it<br />
dictates that the riders will need superhuman assistance. Whilst the race<br />
organizers persist in setting courses that only the doped can conquer,<br />
doping will be inevitable and universal.e the few deaths each season from<br />
EPO or bad vitamins and carry on. </p>
<p>Cynically, I don&#8217;t think doping matters much in terms of sportsmanship, for<br />
the simple reason that everybody&#8217;s already doping. It&#8217;s a level playing field,<br />
albeit a toxic one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

