<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MacBook Air: What a Laptop Should Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcelhearn.com/2008/02/28/the-macbook-air-what-a-laptop-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2008/02/28/the-macbook-air-what-a-laptop-should-be/</link>
	<description>Writings about more than just Macs, by Kirk McElhearn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlimJim</title>
		<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2008/02/28/the-macbook-air-what-a-laptop-should-be/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcelhearn.com/wordpress/?p=321#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Kirk, I enjoyed your comments about the MBA. It gives me a feeling of 
confidence, since I just ordered one to use when traveling. It is the hard drive, 
but upgraded to the 1.8 GHz processor. My main Mac is the MacBook Pro, 15&quot;. 
I&#039;m aware of the lack of several functional features in the MBA, but I&#039;m getting 
it for what it is, and won&#039;t complain on what it&#039;s not. I plan to take it to Europe 
for a month of traveling, and will report back here at the end of the trip with 
my comments...I just became aware of your blog after reading your article in 
the May issue of MacWorld. It looks like a great blog, and I&#039;m looking forward 
to more of your comments on the MBA after further use...SlimJim   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk, I enjoyed your comments about the MBA. It gives me a feeling of<br />
confidence, since I just ordered one to use when traveling. It is the hard drive,<br />
but upgraded to the 1.8 GHz processor. My main Mac is the MacBook Pro, 15&quot;.<br />
I&#8217;m aware of the lack of several functional features in the MBA, but I&#8217;m getting<br />
it for what it is, and won&#8217;t complain on what it&#8217;s not. I plan to take it to Europe<br />
for a month of traveling, and will report back here at the end of the trip with<br />
my comments&#8230;I just became aware of your blog after reading your article in<br />
the May issue of MacWorld. It looks like a great blog, and I&#8217;m looking forward<br />
to more of your comments on the MBA after further use&#8230;SlimJim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2008/02/28/the-macbook-air-what-a-laptop-should-be/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcelhearn.com/wordpress/?p=321#comment-719</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that Macs come with much better software for multimedia work - you 
get iLife, which is a suite with a video editing tool (iMovie), a DVD authoring 
tool (iDVD), and a web tool (iWeb).

Also, not to sound partial, but the OS is much easier to work with; and you 
don&#039;t have to worry about viruses.

Tinderbox is a very interesting tool, and it is very complex. I tried it out a 
couple of years ago, and was impressed by what it can do, but didn&#039;t have 
time to try and fully understand it.

Kirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that Macs come with much better software for multimedia work &#8211; you<br />
get iLife, which is a suite with a video editing tool (iMovie), a DVD authoring<br />
tool (iDVD), and a web tool (iWeb).</p>
<p>Also, not to sound partial, but the OS is much easier to work with; and you<br />
don&#8217;t have to worry about viruses.</p>
<p>Tinderbox is a very interesting tool, and it is very complex. I tried it out a<br />
couple of years ago, and was impressed by what it can do, but didn&#8217;t have<br />
time to try and fully understand it.</p>
<p>Kirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaneEyreZH</title>
		<link>http://www.mcelhearn.com/2008/02/28/the-macbook-air-what-a-laptop-should-be/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>JaneEyreZH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcelhearn.com/wordpress/?p=321#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m new to Mac systems, and recently considered buying a MacBook in the interest of both writing my dissertation on a laptop and learning to compose literary and academic texts that incorporate sounds and images.  I didn&#039;t buy a Mac (though I wanted to) partly because of price restrictions, poor durability reports in online reviews (i need a sturdy little workhorse of a laptop), and because i don&#039;t know how i would be using such programs yet in my work.  
One of my professors, who does work in the rhetoric of composing digital texts, just got a new MacBook Air, and several of my colleagues have Macs.  My brother, who does programming for a company, also swears by Macs.  
I&#039;m quite happy with my Toshiba Satellite A215S5818, as it was both affordable and (thus far) has been very durable - she has been stepped on once, and dropped once (toting a laptop and walking on ice don&#039;t mix), and there are no pixellation problems or odd sounds from within her innards.
I&#039;m wondering, if I&#039;m interested in creating new kinds of multimedia compositions, is Mac really the only way to go?  I&#039;m also very interested in Eastgate&#039;s &quot;Tinderbox&quot; program, if you&#039;re familiar with that - some of the systems of notes users have created look thrillingly complex.  

---
JaneEyreZH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m new to Mac systems, and recently considered buying a MacBook in the interest of both writing my dissertation on a laptop and learning to compose literary and academic texts that incorporate sounds and images.  I didn&#8217;t buy a Mac (though I wanted to) partly because of price restrictions, poor durability reports in online reviews (i need a sturdy little workhorse of a laptop), and because i don&#8217;t know how i would be using such programs yet in my work.<br />
One of my professors, who does work in the rhetoric of composing digital texts, just got a new MacBook Air, and several of my colleagues have Macs.  My brother, who does programming for a company, also swears by Macs.<br />
I&#8217;m quite happy with my Toshiba Satellite A215S5818, as it was both affordable and (thus far) has been very durable &#8211; she has been stepped on once, and dropped once (toting a laptop and walking on ice don&#8217;t mix), and there are no pixellation problems or odd sounds from within her innards.<br />
I&#8217;m wondering, if I&#8217;m interested in creating new kinds of multimedia compositions, is Mac really the only way to go?  I&#8217;m also very interested in Eastgate&#8217;s &quot;Tinderbox&quot; program, if you&#8217;re familiar with that &#8211; some of the systems of notes users have created look thrillingly complex.  </p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
JaneEyreZH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
