“…making books less expensive might benefit Amazon and its customers, but it sucks the life out of publishers and the authors who need their services. Big publishers bear much of the blame for their troubles. They pay out vast sums for dubious projects, often ignore their “midlist,” publish far too many titles, and generally treat the book trade as if it were a business like TV, when, in fact, it’s closer to an artisanal craft.”
Glenn Fleishman gave a good explanation of the Amazon/Hachette dispute in a TidBITS article, but one of the broader questions here is whether or not books should be a commodity. As both a reader and author, I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I want to be able to get books for less; I have a couple thousand of them, and any savings I can make on one book allow me to buy more.
But as an author, what’s happening is a bit chilling. I buy the occasional Kindle ebook from Amazon at prices from £1-2 (I live in the UK), and I know how little authors get from these. Yes, some are loss leaders; for example, my friend Peter Robinson has a new mystery out Abattoir Blues, (Amazon UK), and, to get readers into the series, one of his older books, Wednesday’s Child (Amazon UK), is currently on sale for £0.99.
The real problem here is that the value of books is being cheapened; when you can get books for a buck or a quid, you’ll be less likely to pay full price for any other books. Sure, the ones by your favorite author will still tempt you, even in hardcover, but if books get too cheap, authors won’t be able to afford to write.